THE CANADIAN LAW TIMES Edited by E. DOUGLAS ARMOUR, Q.C., Of Osgoode Hall, Barrister-at-Law VOL. XVI. TORONTO: THE CARSWELL Co. (LTD.) PUBLISHERS. 1896. Entered according to Act of the Parliament of Canada, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six, by THE CARSWELL Co. (Limited), in the office of the Minister of Agriculture. LIBRARY OF THE LELAND STAYFORB, JR., UNIVERSITY LA DEPARTMENT. TABLE OF CASES. Those marked * are not reported in the regular or official reports of the Dominion and Provinces. A. Abraham v. Hacking, 108. Adams v. McBeath, 431, 515. Adams v. National Electric Tram way and Lighting Co., 470, 509. Adamson v. Rogers, 242. Etna Life Ins. Co. v. Sharp, 230. Dominion Live Stock Association of Canada, 348. "Ainoka," The, 468. Aldrich v. Canada Permanent L. & S. Co., 247. *Allen, In re- Allen v. Allen, 177. American Dunlop Tire Co. v. An derson Tire Co., 485. Anderson v. Grand Trunk R. W. Co., 185. Anderson v. Henderson-In re Bagwell, 90. Anderson Tire Co. of Toronto V. American Dunlop Tire Co., 485. Archibald v. Delisle, 428, 453, 484. Ardagh v. County of York, 219. Argles v. McMath, 34. Armour v. Merchants' Bank of Can- Banque Ville Marie v. Morrison, 409, ada, 88. Armstrong, In re, 9. Armstrong v. Lye, 218. Armstrong v. McClelland, 499, 515. Armstrong v. Nason, 499, 515. Armstrong v. Wright, 499, 515. Aspland v. Hampson, 446. "Atalanta," The-Strong v. Smith, 467. Attorney-General v. Cameron, 193. Attorney-General v. Ewen, 435, 454. Attorney-General v. Hamilton Street R. W. Co., 7. Attorney-General v. Munn, 435, 454. Attorney-General v. Sears, 497. Attorney-General v. Smith, 497. Attorney-General v. White, 497. 499. Barber v. Toronto R. W. Co., 381. Barclay v. McAvity, 428. Barnes v. Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Ins. Assn., 76. Bartram v. Village of London West, 405. Bauld v. Challoner, 402, 488. | Bavin v. Bavin, 261. "Beatrice," The, 469. Beattie v. Dinnick, 107. Beatty and Finlayson, In re, 251. Beaty v. Gregory, 350. Beaven v. Fell, 404, 439. Becherer v. Asher, 158. Beckes v. Tiernan-in re Molphy, 335. 76928 |