Para/worlds: Entanglements of Art and HistoryThe essays in this book engage in a broad range of topics, stretching from Anacreon and Horace to Kafka and Samuel Beckett, and they concern themselves with the notion of Art and Life as "para-worlds," or fields of being that elucidate and complete each other, answer and imply each other, confront and contradict each other: in short, with the "entanglements of Art and History." Pearce finds centrally that there is at present a crisis in literary criticism. On the one hand, there is a bustling and exciting crop of competing critical schools, each with its special mind-set, each tending to regard itself as the final hierophantic mode. On the other, it seems clear that criticism has recently become a part of higher pathology diagnosing and (if possible) eradicating, as Giles Gunn says, "the disease called literature." The result is that scholars and critics have become more and more self-conscious and obsessive about the purpose and methods of their work. The critical approaches that Pearce himself has employed in these essays are those of no one school or dogma but are almost as varied as the texts themselves, ranging from essays in classical scholarship, through new critical close readings, to postmodernist semiotic analysis. But whether traditional or innovative in method, each of these essays aims in the first instance to be what Anatole France once said all true criticism should be: "the adventure of the soul among masterpieces." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 37
... common that almost make them versions of each other : verticality , or loftiness ( physical , personal , national ) ; as- cendability ( stairs , successive landings , fountain basins , the passing centuries , the tiers of branches ) ...
... common people , to arise in a more receptive time , " remembered , in the end , as names in some popular song . In this treatment of the last plays I have touched on none of the things that make them exciting reading or , rightly ...
... common people . " I wonder about that . There is no reason for supposing that this ode was read by the common people ; it was certainly not addressed to them , like a Kipling ballad ; or that one of the most urbane poets of that or any ...