"Why then you know the laundress, Sally Wrench ?" "She is my cousin, Sir, and next-door neighbour." "That's lucky-I've a message for the wench, Which needs despatch, and you may save my labour. Give her this kiss, my dear, and say I sent it, But mind, you owe me one-I've only lent it." "She shall know," cried the girl, as she brandish'd her bough, “Of the loving intentions you bore me ; But as to the kiss, as there's haste, you'll allow For she, at the rate she is scampering now, Will reach Acton some minutes before me." The Farmer's Wife and the Gascon. AT Neuchatel, in France, where they prepare But as salt-water made their charms increase, This damsel had to help her in the farm, In fact a gaby, And such a glutton when you came to feed him, That Wantley's dragon, who "ate barns and churches, As if they were geese and turkies," (Vide the Ballad,) scarcely could exceed him. One morn she had prepared a monstrous bowl And wouldn't go to Church (good careful soul !) Watch it he did he never took his eyes off, Like my Lord Salisbury, he heaved a sigh, Each moment did his appetite grow stronger; At length he could not bear it any longer, But on all sides his looks he turn'd, And finding that the coast was clear, he quaff'd Scudding from church, the farmer's wife Flew to the dairy; But stood aghast, and could not, for her life, One sentence mutter, Until she summon'd breath enough to utter "Holy St. Mary!" And shortly, with a face of scarlet, The vixen (for she was a vixen) flew Upon the varlet, Asking the when, and where, and how, and who Had gulp'd her cream, nor left an atom; To which he gave not separate replies, "The flies, you rogue!-the flies, you guttling dog! I'll make you tell another story quickly.” Who bore him to the judge-a little prig, With angry bottle-nose Like a red cabbage-rose, While lots of white ones flourish'd on his wig. He turn'd to the delinquent, And 'gan to question him and catechise Still the same dogged answers rise, "The flies, my Lord-the flies, the flies!" "Psha!" quoth the Judge, half peevish and half pompous, "Why, you're non compos. You should have watch'd the bowl, as she desired, "To kill the flies in this here town ?"- You've my authority, where'er you meet 'em, If yonder blue-bottle (I know his face) Isn't the very leader of the gang That stole the cream;-let me come near it!"- At a large fly upon the Judge's nose, The luckless blue-bottle he smash'd, THE ELOQUENCE OF EYES. -Nor doth the eye itself, That most pure spirit of sense, behold itself, SHAKSPEARE. THE origin of language is a puzzling point, of which no satisfactory solution has yet been offered. Children could not originally have compounded it, for they would always want intelligence to construct any thing so complicated and difficult; and as it is known that after a certain age the organs of speech, if they have not been called into play, lose their flexibility, it is contended, that adults possessing the faculties to combine a new language would want the power to express it. Divine inspiration is the only clue that presents itself in this emergency; and we are then driven upon the incredibility of supposing that celestial ears and organs could ever have been instrumental in originating the Low Dutch, in which language an assailant of Voltaire drew upon himself the memorable retort from the philosopher: "That he wished him more wit and fewer consonants." No one, however, seems to have contemplated the possibility that Nature never meant us to speak, any more than the parrot, to whom she has given similar powers of articulation; or to have speculated upon the extent of the substitutes she has provided, supposing that man had never discovered the process of representing appetites, feelings, and ideas by sound. Grief, joy, anger, and some of the simple passions, express themselves by similar intelligible exclamations in all countries; these, therefore, may be considered as the whole primitive language of Nature; but if she had left the rest of her vocabulary to be conveyed by human features and gestures, man, by addressing himself to the eyes instead of the ears, would have still possessed a medium of communication nearly as specific as speech, with the great advantage of its being silent as the telegraph. Talking with his features instead of his tongue, he would not only save all the time lost in unravelling the subtleties of the grammarians from Priscian to Lily and Lindley Murray, but he would instantly become a cosmopolitan, a citizen of the world, and might travel "from old Belerium to the northern main," without needing an interpreter. We are not hastily to pronounce against the possibility of carrying this dumb eloquence to a certain point of perfection, for the experiment has never been fairly tried. We know that the exercise of cultivated reason, and the arts of civilized life, have eradicated many of our original instincts, and that the loss of any one sense invariably quickens the others; and we may |