Page images
PDF
EPUB

"them;" signifies the immediate direct instrument, the sword which they would employ in their defence.

These are instances of words, in our Language, which, by careless writers, are apt to be employed as perfectly synonimous, and yet are not so. Their significations approach, but are not precisely the same. The more the distinction in the meaning of such words is weighed, and attended to, the more clearly and forcibly shall we speak or write.*

From all that has been said on this head, it will now appear, that, in order to write or speak with Precision, two things are especially requisite; one, that an author's own ideas be clear and distinct; and the other, that he have an exact and full comprehension of the force of those words which he employs. Natural genius is here required; labour and attention still Dean Swift is one of the authors, in our Language, most distinguished for Precision of Style. In his writings, we seldom or never find vague expressions, and synonimous words, carelessly thrown together. His meaning is always clear, and strongly marked.

more.

I had occasion to observe before, that though all subjects of writing or discourse demand Perspicuity, yet all do not require the same degree of that exact Precision, which I have endeavoured to explain. It is, indeed, in every sort of writing, a great beauty to have, at least, some measure of Precision, in. distinction from that loose profusion of words which imprints no clear idea on the reader's mind. But we must, at the same time, be on our guard, lest too great a study of Precision, especially in subjects where it is not strictly requisite, betray us into a dry and barren Style; lest, from the desire of pruning too closely, we retrench all copiousness and ornament. Some de

* In French there is a very useful treatise on this subject, the Abbé Girard's Synonymes Francoises, in which he has made a large collection of such apparent Synonymes in the Language, and shewn, with much accuracy, the difference in their signification. It is much to be wished, that some such work were undertaken for our tongue, and executed with equal taste and judgment. Nothing would contribute more to precise and elegant writing. In the mean time, this French Treatise may be perused with considerble profit. It will accustom persons to weigh, with attention, the force of words; and will suggest several distinctions betwixt synonimous terms in our own Language, analogous to those which he has pointed out in the French; and, accordingly, several, of the instances above given were suggested by the work of this author.

[subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed]

gree of this failing may, perhaps, be remarked in Dean Swift's serious works. Attentive only to exhibit his ideas clear and exact, resting wholly on his sense and distinctness, he appears to reject, disdainfully, all embellishment, which, on some occasions, may be thought to render his manner somewhat hard and dry. To unite Copiousness and Precision, to be flowing and graceful, and, at the same time, correct and exact in the choice of every word, is, no doubt, one of the highest and most, difficult attainments in writing. Some kinds of composition may require more of Copiousness and ornament; others, more of Precision and accuracy; nay, in the same composition, the different parts of it may demand a proper variation of manner. But we must study never to sacrifice, totally, any one of these, qualities to the other; and, by a proper management, both of them may be made fully consistent, if our own ideas be precise and our knowledge and stock of words be, at the same time, extensive.

145

LECTURE XI.

STRUCTURE OF SENTENCES.

HAVING begun to treat of Style, in the last Lecture I considered its fundamental quality, Perspicuity. What I have said of this, relates chiefly to the choice of words. From words I proceed to Sentences; and as, in all writing and discourse, the proper composition and Structure of Sentences is of the highest importance, I shall treat of this fully. Though Perspicuity be the general head under which I, at present, consider Language, I shall not confine myself to this quality alone, in Sentences, but shall inquire also, what is requisite for their Grace and Beauty: that I may bring together, under one view, all that seems necessary to be attended to in the construction and arrangement of words in a Sentence.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

It is not easy to give an exact definition of a Sentence, or Period, farther, than as it always implies some one complete proposition or enunciation of thought. Aristotle's definition is, in the main, a good one: Λεξις έχεσα αρχην και τελευτην καθ' αυτην, και μέγεθος ευσύνοπτον :” 6 A form of Speech which hath "a beginning and an end within itself, and is of such a length as to be easily comprehended at once." This, however, admits of great latitude. For a Sentence, or Period, consists always of component parts, which are called its members; and as these members may be either few or many, and may be connected in several different ways, the same thought, or mental proposition, may often be either brought into one Sentence, or split into two or three, without the material breach of any rule. The first variety that occurs in the consideration of Sentences, is, the distinction of long and short ones. The precise length of Sentences, as to the number of words, or the number of members, which may enter into them, cannot be ascertained

U

by any definite measure. Only, it is obvious, there may be an extreme on either side. Sentences, immoderately long, and consisting of too many members, always transgress some one or other of the rules which I shall mention soon, as necessary to be observed in every good Sentence. In discourses that are to be spoken, regard must be had to the easiness of pronunciation, which is not consistent with too long periods. In compositions where pronunciation has no place, still, However, by using long periods too frequently, an author overloads the reader's ear, and fatigues his attention. For long periods require, evidently, more attention than short ones, in order to perceive clearly the connexion of the several parts, and to take in the whole at one view. At the same time, there may be an excess in too many short Sentences also; by which the sense is split and broken, the connexion of thought weakened, and the memory burdened, by presenting to it a long succession of minute objects.

With regard to the length and construction of Sentences, the French critics make a very just distinction of Style, into Style Périodique and Style Coupé. The Style Périodique is, where the Sentences are composed of several members linked together, and hanging upon one another; so that the sense of the whole is not brought out till the close. This is the most pompous, musical, and oratorical manner of composing; as in the following sentence of Sir William Temple: "If you look about you, ❝ and consider the lives of others as well as your own; if you "think how few are born with honour, and how many die "without name or children; how little beauty we see, and "how few friends we hear of; how many diseases, and how "much poverty there is in the world; you will fall down up"on your knees, and, instead of repining at one affliction, will "admire so many blessings which you have received from the "hand of God." (Letter to Lady Essex.) Cicero abounds with Sentences constructed after this manner.

The Style Coupé is, where the sense is formed into short independent propositions, each complete within itself; as in the following of Mr. Pope: "I confess, it was want of considera"tion that made me an author. I writ, because it amused me.

I corrected, because it was as pleasant to me to correct as to

"write. I published, because, I was told, I might please such "as it was a credit to please." (Preface to his works.) This is very much the French method of writing; and always suits gay and easy subjects. The Style Périodique, gives an air of gravity and dignity to composition. The Style Coupé, is more lively and striking. According to the nature of the composition, therefore, and the general character it ought to bear, the one or other may be predominant. But, in almost every kind of composition, the great rule is to intermix them. For the ear tires of either of them when too long continued: whereas by a proper mixture of long and short periods, the ear is gratified, and a certain sprightliness is joined with majesty in our style. "Non semper," says Cicero (describing very expressively, these two different kinds of Styles, of which I have been speaking). "non semper utendum est perpetuitate, & quasi conversione "verborum; sed sæpe carpenda membris minutioribus oratio> est."*

66.

This variety is of so great consequence, that it must be studied, not only in the succession of long and short Sentences, but in the Structure of our Sentences also. A train of Sentences, constructed in the same manner, and with the same number of members, whether long or short, should never be allowed to succeed one another. However musical each of them may be, it has a better effect to introduce even a discord, than to cloy the ear with the repetition of similar sounds: For, nothing is so tiresome as perpetual uniformity. In this article of the construction and distribution of his Sentences, Lord Shaftsbury has shewn great art. In the last Lecture I observed, that he is often guilty of Sacrificing precision of style to pomp of expression; and that there runs through his whole manner, a stiffness and affectation, which render him very unfit to be considered as a general model. But as his ear was fine, and as he was extremely attentive to every thing that is elegant, he has studied the proper intermixture of long and short Sentences, with variety and harmony in their structure, more than any other English author; and for this part of composition he deserves attention.

** It is not proper always to employ a continual train, and a sort of regular compass of phrases; but style ought to be often broken down into smaller " members."

« PreviousContinue »