partial, unjust, and still unknown. A standing revelation to all mankind would be necessary, and not one subject to human defects and caprices, such as that now before us, and of which we are told that its being translated from the Greek into the English language, depended upon the King's special command. It was then to the English nation, a revelation from the King, and not from God. It was a revelation from the translator, from the printer, from the King, from the scribe, from any one but God. No where is it recorded, that God should say "I will reveal myself to mankind through a book, which revelation shall extend when printing is invented, and men shall only know me by learning to read, and in proportion as they do read that book." This would be preposterous. Yet, such is the inference to be drawn from the language which is commonly used on this subject.

The words," our Lord and Saviour," or "The New Testament of our Lord and Saviour," authoritatively describe the King's Lord and Saviour, and not a common Lord and Saviour for mankind. While the words Jesus Christ were an improper mixture of Latin and English, and should either be Jes Christ, as English, or Jesus Christus, as Latin, and were the borrowed nimes of Bacchus, etymologically appropriate, both as to style and character, and clearly phantasmal in all relations to Judea.

The King's appointment to have the book read in churches is a bad recommendation for its pretension of divine revelation; for were the revelation clear, the King's appointment would not be a recommendation, nor would it be needed. It now comes to us like the Athanasian Creed, or the Thirty Nine Articles, infinitely suspicious as to its worth. The God is only revealed by the King's appointment.

The English title of the first book, is a proof, that the king, the translator, and the printer, had no other idea of the book than that it was a romance. The word, gospel, is perfectly romantic in its meaning, signifying God's spell or charm, and our ancestors, who first received it, took it in no other light, than that the reading of the book, or the writing and wearing of sentences of it, would operate as a spell or charm, to drive away evils and to procure benefits. Hence the meaning may be gathered, of the allusion in one of the gospels, to the wearing of phylacteries; and hence the present superstition of the Irish, who will fasten written or printed sentences from the gospels to the horns of their cows, to bring more milk, or to the heels of their horses, to drive away and keep away a swelling or a lameness.

Critical illustrations of this kind were carried on, which made the book, in the eyes of a reasonable person, appear as contemptible as the romantic stories of Jack the Giant Killer, Cinderilla, or Tom Thumb and the Cow; and the time will certainly come, when the gospels, even according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, will, by another generation, be looked back upon or received

as the nursery companions of our present mischievous nursery books. It is neither rash nor unfair to say, that they do not come within the scope of reasonable and respectable criticism. Wild romance cannot be treated as doubtful truths.

Mr. Taylor will continue these readings, passing over such allusions to the birth of Jesus Christ, as will not admit of decent comment, or of such as is proper to be mentioned in a mixed company.

Mr. Carlile mentioned an apology for the introduction of the Mahometan religion to be, that, the Christian had become so very corrupt by being founded upon so wild a romance, common human decency required a change, and that change Mahomet successfully introduced into almost all those countries in which the Christian religion then existed. It was urged, that the Christian romance had grown and would grow less and less evidential by time, and more and more corrupt as it lasted, that six hundred years had so far worn it out, as to require some better and higher religious restraint among mankind. This was introduced, and it' would have been well, if the Christian had been entirely subdued and checked in farther progress by the Mahometan. It has now to encounter something higher than a religious check. It has corrupted England for twelve hundred years, and since Mahometanism has never reached us, let us now try to make an amend, by introducing a system of ethics without religion, that shall be better than either. Let us now have war with all the superstition' R. C. that degrades the human mind

NOTICE.

I have seen the article in the Leeds Mercury of Sept. 26, and again on the 3d inst. signed, "Thomas Brook," professing to report the proceedings of one of our Huddersfield Meetings; and I will next week show that Mr. Brook is not an honest and faithful reporter, by addressing to the editor of the "Leeds Mercury" such an analysis of Potter's translation of the Prometheus of Eschylus, as shall satisfy any one as to its very close resemblance to the story of the gospels. I should have liked nothing better than to have seen in the "Leeds Mercury" a faithful report of each night's proceeding in Huddersfield; but this Thomas Brook was one of our opponents, who was made to look very little in his defence of the Christian religion, and who has misrepresented the proceedings, to gratify any other spirit than a love of truth. I read several passages from the work closely applicable to the question, and failed only in finding one, which Mr. Taylor has often quoted, and which begins-" Ah me, see what, a God, I suffer from the Gods." I heard an admission made the next day, that it was not a perfect copy. At any rate, I will make that sort of analysis as will falsify the report of Mr. Brook in the "Leeds Mercury."

t

R. C.,

THIRTIETH DISCOURSE.

On the Moral Improvement of Circumstances.

Delivered in the Areopagus, on Easter Sunday 1827. By the Rev. ROBERT TAYLOR, B. A. Orator of the Society,

MEN AND BRETHREN-The moral science is the ultimate and
noblest science, to the attainment of which, the powers of man
can be directed: nature, or if without offence of science, we may
so designate what we know not, the great author of nature has pro-
pounded the production of a perfectly wise and good man as the ne
plus ultra of his designing mind, the acme of all excellence, the
paragon of all perfection. When I contemplate this Areopagus, late
indeed in the history of man, but not too late redeemed from its
original destination to the perpetuation of gothic ignorance, and
dedicated henceforth to the inculcation of that everlasting law
of righteousness, whose foundation is science, whose evidence is
nature, whose text is reason, whose effect shall be happiness to
the human race; I cannot but estimate all the difficulties, dis-
couragements, and sorrows, which must be encountered in the
struggle, even pending the very crisis, when my swelling heart
doth almost break its fibres under the keen sense of them, as
cheaply paid for such a glorious guerdon. Shall mankind but
one day have done with following the consecrated follies of their
barbarous ancestors, and begin to be wise for themselves, to think
and act like men; happy shall be the man that laid out his life
and his life's energies, to the contributing to that effect-happy
when the intolerant bigotry of the magistrate would have cut hịm
off from all share in the humanity of his fellow citizens—happy:
when the mistaken people would cover him with unmerited re-
proach-happy amid the horrors of captivity-happy when the
last struggle of exhausted nature shall send him to the grave,
"And more true joy Marcellus exiled feels,
Than Cesar, with a senate at his heels.

One self-approving hour, whole years outweighs,
Of stupid gazers, and of loud huzzas.

Who noble ends, by noble means attains,

Or failing, smiles in dungeons and in chains;
Like good Aurelius let him reign, or bleed,
Like Socrates, that man is great indeed."

The great counsel and purpose of nature to evolve and bring forth the moral capabilities of man, may be traced from the very first origination of animal life, even in the most inferior works of creation. All is elementary, all subsidiary and preparative to the grand ulterior production of a mind. The universe is the theatre, all the world the stage, all creatures else, the servants and the instruments of the scene; but man is the hero of great nature's drama. 'Twill be my particular happiness, should I live to see

the day, when the storm of persecution now hanging over me, shall have left my mind to that tranquillity, which, philosophical pursuits so essentially require, to bring before you the physiological demonstrations to which I am pledged to trace out this great propositum of nature, in the phenomena of comparative anatomy, and thus to introduce you into the sublime temple of moral virtue, as founded upon its only basis, physical and mathematical science. "Twill not be very easy to fail of being a good man, and consequently a happy one, when you shall find that nothing but ignorance, mistake, and infirmity, can produce an aberration from the mathematical line of moral rectitude, that virtue is nothing more than a highly cultivated reason, and that right heartily to wish to be virtuous, is accomplishment enough to set out with, for making sure of being so,

As all the laws of physical life, so all the circumstances in which man is at any time placed, subserve the great purpose of producing his moral character. Man is therefore with philosophical propriety, said to be the creature of his circumstances, as certainly taking the complexion of his mind, as he does the strength or weakness of his body from the operation of those circumstances upon him.

It will be hereafter (if my Christian persecutors shall hereafter forgive me the offence, which I cannot now recall if I would) that I shall analyze the moral indications of physical phenomena. I shall now endeavour to point out the moral improvement of existing circumstances, of whose uncontrolable operation on the mind, you have what the anatomists would call a preparation before you, exhibiting the immense difficulty, with which a mind much pressed on by the weight of those circumstances, could apply itself to any other. It is in proportion as the mind can command the power of diverting itself from the impression of present circumstances, and exercise an election and choice of the ideas that it will entertain, that it is estimated as a strong or weak mind. We absurdly give, or take credit to ourselves, for our enjoyment of a degree of self-possession, or a mental serenity, to which we could contribute no more, than we can to the temperature of the weather. The problem, from the impossibility of calculating the degree in which the pressure operates, and the sensibility of the mind to its operation, will always remain incapable of solution: these must be the two given quantities in the quadratic, to find out the resulting third, upon which censure shall be just. We may congratulate a man, but cannot praise him for being of a strong mind-we may pity, but ought not to blame him for being of a weak one.

In the strong impressions supposed to operate on the mind of the lover, his perfect passiveness and utter incapacity to abstract himself from the force of those impressions, has been recognised in all ages, and adorned in the similar fictions of the pastoral

poetry of all nations. The swain is ever supposed to be the creature of his mistress. He is said to be absent from the company with which he is surrounded, and lives in a world of her creation; and so to be sure

"If Delia frowns, all nature mourns, the skies descend in showers, Hushed are the birds, and closed the drooping flowers.

If Delia smiles, the flowers begin to spring,

The skies to brighten, and the birds to sing."

It is from this law of nature, that conscience derives its power to punish. The guilty man is haunted by the personified remembrance of his crime, and cannot abstract himself from the censure of that moral justice, which we see in this instance directly ori ginating in the laws of his physical organization.

"Evasisse putes quos diri conscia facti

Mens habet attonitos, et surdo verbere cædit
Occultum quatiente animo tortore flagellum."

"Think'st thou the wretch whom human laws release,
Scapes heaven's high wrath, and spends his days in peace?
No. Conscience, fell avenger, ever wakes;

With horror fills the astonished soul, and shakes

A scorpion whip unseen by human eyes,
Tortures the villain, and all rest denies."

The victim of oppression, as well as the oppressor, will in like manner be irresistibly overborne, by the strong impression of the wrongs that he hath suffered, especially while a continuance and aggravation of those wrongs hangs still like the threatening cloud of impending vengeance over his head. Thus, supposing any man to have been thrown into a prison on a cold winter's night, where he had almost died of cold, and not to be released the next day, because that was Sunday, and it would be a sin you know to do a good natured act of a Sunday. Nay, I have heard, (and a most commendable example it is for this whole city to follow) that there are those who have their dinners cooked on a Saturday night, preferring to have their mutton cold, for the sake of getting their gospel hot.

I am only supposing a case; but supposing that when after the man that had been so thrown into prison, had expected his release on the Monday, he was sent back again to prison till the Wednesday, only because it COULD be done, by a merciless stretch of arbitrary power, what impressions would become predominant in that man's mind? How naturally and irresistibly would all the objects of his senses take a complexion from the medium of his just resentment. Every ugly unyielding stone that stumbled him in his path, would seem to be a lord mayor set in bass-relief, (hard as his heart, and senseless as his understanding) every death's head in the church yard, so the teeth were out, would look like a grinning city solicitor, presenting the hideousness of a memento-mori, impregnant of its moral. As it is impossible not to see, in such a sketch, the almost mechanical operation of