Page images
PDF
EPUB

A long review of Nos. 66 and 67; combats Mutschmann on all his main points. Mutschmann replies with considerable skill (pp. 429–30) and Fischer again returns to the attack (pp. 431-32): the point of this supplementary discussion is whether or not the term "aubrun," which Aubrey used to describe the color of Milton's hair, meant "white" in the seventeenth century.

72. S. B. LILJEGREN. A fresh Milton-Powell document. In E. S., 1921, LV, 40-45.

Publishes for the first time the petition of Anne Powell (Milton's mother-in-law) to the Council of State asking the restoration of the property of her husband which had been confiscated and sold after the siege of Oxford.

73. GUSTAV HÜBENER. Milton's Satan. In E. S., 1921, LV, 13639.

Studies the rôle of resentment in the character of Satan.

74. HEINRICH MUTSCHMANN. Zur Milton-Frage. In E. S., 1921, LV, 140-46.

Replies to his critics, particularly Herr Hübener.

75. RUDOLF METZ. Nochmal der andere Milton. In E. S., 1921, LV, 313-18.

A new attack on Herr Mutschmann.

76. GUSTAV HÜBENER. Erwiderung. In E. S., 1921, LV, 318-19. A reply to No. 74, attacking especially this time the theory of Milton's albinism.

77. HEINRICH MUTSCHMANN. Nochmals zur Milton-Frage. In E. S., 1921, LV, 479-80.

A reply to his adversaries with No. 76 as a starting-point. 78. HEINRICH MUTSCHMANN. Toland und Milton. In B. A., April, 1921, XXXII, 87–90.

79. S. B. LILJEGREN. In B. A., June, 1921, XXXII, 121–25. A hostile review of the theories of Herr Mutschmann.

80. HEINRICH MUTSCHMANN. Zur Psychologie des Verfassers der "Nachtgedanken." In B. A., January, 1922, XXXIII, 12

23.

Applies his theories to Edward Young; accuses W. Thomas (Le poète Edward Young, Paris, 1901) of having gone too far in idealizing his character.

81. S. B. LILJEGREN. Ethisches und Literaturanalytisches zur Milton-Frage. In E. S., 1922, LVI, 59–68.

Replies to No. 73; raises anew the question of the character of Milton and of the expression of this character in Satan; stresses the harmony between his views and those of La pensée de Milton.

82. F. A. POMPEN. Recent theories about Milton's personality. In Neophilologus, July, 1922, VII, 272-79.

83. WALTHER FISCHER. Der alte und der neue Milton. In Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift, September-October, 1922,

X, 292-305.

84. S. B. LILJEGREN. Die englischen Quellen der Philosophie Miltons und verwandtes Denken. In B. A., October, 1922, XXXIII, 196–206.

A discussion of Milton's "mortalism " and its relations to seventeenthcentury thought.

85. S. B. LILJEGREN. Milton's philosophy in the light of recent research. In the Scandinavian Scientific Review, 1923, II, 114-23.

Sums up the theses proposed in La pensée de Milton together with what has been done since on the philosophy of Milton.

86. HEINRICH MUTSCHMANN. Miltons Selbstdarstellung in L'Al

legro und Il Penseroso. In B. A., 1923, XXXIV, 338-42. 87. S. B. LILJEGREN. La pensée de Milton et Giordano Bruno. In Revue de littérature comparée, October-December, 1923, III, 516-40.

88. D. SAURAT AND C. CABANNES. Milton devant la médicine. In Revue anglo-américaine, December, 1923, I, 120-34.

See Appendix A, above. A portion of the article, containing a criticism of the theories of Herr Mutschmann (pp. 125-28), has been omitted from this translation.

89. S. B. LILJEGREN. Milton's personality. In Neophilologus, January, 1924, IX, 119–21.

Supplements and corrects No. 82; brings out some of the implications of his own and my researches into the character of Milton.

90. J. H. HARDER. Milton, Puritan or Calvinist? In Neophilologus, April, 1924, IX, 199–203.

91. S. B. LILJEGREN. Milton Wahl des Berufs. In B. A., May, 1924, XXXV, 158-60.

A criticism of H. Schöffler, Protestantismus und Literatur (Leipzig, 1922), pp. 39-44, on the question of the motives which led Milton to abandon his intention of entering the church.

92. J. VELDKAMP. Calvinism and pride. In Neophilologus, July,

1924, IX, 281-83.

A reply to No. 89.

93. WALTHER FISCHER. Defoe und Milton. In E. S., 1924, LVIII,

213-27

INDEX

« PreviousContinue »