Th' affembly feated, rifing o'er the reft, Achilles thus the king of men addrest. Why leave we not the fatal Trojan fhore, And measure back the feas we croft before? 80 85 The plague destroying whom the fword would fpare, He faid, and fat: when Chalcas thus reply'd: 90 95 Thus fpoke the prudence and the fears of age. Why angry Phoebus bends his fatal bow? Firft Ver. 79. Why leave we not the fatal Trojan shore, etc.] The artifice of this fpeech according to Dionyfius of Halicarnaffus, is admirably carried on to open an accufation against Agamemnon, whom Achilles fufpects to be the caufe of all their miferies. He directs himself not to the affembly, but to Agamemnon; he names not only the plague, but the war too, as having exhausted them all, which was evidently due to his family. He leads the Augurs he would confult, by pointing at fomething lately done with refpe&t to Apollo. And while he continues within the guard of civil expreffion, scattering his infinuations, he encourages thofe who may have more knowledge to fpeak out boldly, by letting them fee there is a party made for their fafety; which has its effect immediately in the following fpeech of Chalcas, whofe demand of protection fhows upon whom the offence is to be placed. Ver. 97. Belov'd of Jove, Achilles!] Thefe appellations of praise and honour, with which the heroes in Homer to frequent ly First give thy faith, and plight a prince's word To whom Pelides. From thy inmost foul 100 105 Speak what thou know'st, and speak without controu Long as Achilles breathes this vital air, 115 ly falute each other, were agreeable to the ftyle of the ancient times, as appears from several of the like nature in the fcripture. Milton has not been wanting to give his poem this cast of antiquity, throughout which our firft parents almost always accoft each other with fome title, that expreffes a refpect to the dignity of hu man nature. Daughter of God and man, immortal Eve Adam, earth's ballow'd mould of God infpir'd. Offspring of heaven and earıb, and all earib's Lord, etc. Ver. 115. Not ev'n the chief.] After Achilles had brought in Chalcas by his dark doubts concerning Agamemnon, Chalcas who perceived them, and was unwilling to be the firft that named the king, artfully demands a protection in such a manner, as confirms thofe doubts, and extorts from Achilles this warm and particular expreffion: "That he would protect him even against Agamenon," (who, as he says, is now the greatest man of Greece, to hint that at the expiration of the war he fhould be again reduced to be barely king of Mycena.) This place Plutarch takes notice of as the first in which Achilles fhews his contempt of foverign authority. Encou Encourage'd thus, the blameless man replies; Nor vows unpaid, nor flighted facrifice, 120 125 But he, oar chief, provok'd the raging pest, 130 Still muft that tongue fome wounding meffage bring,. And ftill thy priestly pride provoke thy king? For this are Phoebus' oracles explor'd, 135 To teach the Greeks to murmur at their lord? 140 Ver. 131. Augur accurf.] This, and the two following lines, are in a manner repetitions of the fame thing thrice over. It is left to the reader to confider how far it may be allowed, or rather praised for a beauty, when we confider with Euftathius that it is a moft natural effect of anger to be full of words, and infitting on that which galls us. We may add, that these reiterated expreffions might be supposed to be thrown out one after another, as Agamemnon is ftruck in the confufion of his paffion, first by the remembrance of one prophecy, and then of another, which the fame man had uttered against him. Not Not half fo dear were Clytemnestra's charms, When first her blooming beauties bleft my arms. 145 150 155 Would't Ver. 143. Not half fo dear were Clytæmneftra's charms.] Agamem non having heard the charge which Chalcas drew up against him in two particulars, that he had affronted the priest, and refused to restore his daughter; he offers one anfwer which gives foften ing colours to both, that he loved her as well as his queen Clytæmneftra, for her perfections. Thus he would feem to fatisfy the father by kindness to his daughter, to excuse himself before the Greeks for what is past, and to make a merit of yeilding her and facrificing his paffion for their fafety. Ver. 155. Infariate King] Here, where this paffion of anger grows loud, it seems proper to prepare the reader, and prevent his mistake in the character of Achilles, which might fhock him in feveral particulars following. We should know that the poet rather ftudied nature than perfection, in the laying down his characters. He refolved to fing the confequences of anger; he confidered what virtues and vices would conduce most to bring his moral out of the fable; and artfully disposed them in his chief perfons after the manner in which we generally find them; making the fault which moft peculiarly attends any good quality, to refide with it. Thus he has placed pride with magnanimity in Agamemnon, and craft with prudence in Ulyffes, And thus we must take his Achilles, not as a mere heroic difpaffioned character, but as compounded of courage and anger; one who finds himself almoft invincible, and affumes an uncontrouled carriage upon the felf Would't thou the Greeks their lawful prey fhould yeild, The due reward of many a well fought field? We share with justice, as with toil we gain : 160 But to refume whate'er thy av'rice craves, The spoils of Ilion fhall thy lofs requite, Whene'er, by Jove's decree, our conquering pow'rs 165 Then thus the king. Shall I my prize refign 170 175 felf-consciousness of his worth; whose high ftrain of honour will not fuffer him to betray his friends, or fight against them, even when he thinks they have affronted him; but whose inexorable refentment will not let him hearken to any terms of accomodation. Ver. 172. Firft let the just equivalent.] The reasoning in point of right between Achilles and Agamemnon feems to be this. Achilles pleads that Agamemnon could not seize upon any other man's captive without a new diftribution, it being an invasion of private property. On the other hand, as Agamemnon's power was limited, how came it that all the Grecian captains would fubmit to an illegal and arbitrary action? I think the legal pretence for his feizing Brifeis must have been founded upon that law, whereby the commander in chief had the power of taking what part of the prey. he pleafed for his own ufe: and he being obliged to restore what he had taken, it feemed but juft that he should have a fecond choice. The |