singular occasion, was fourscore and four persons, including fifteen children; and at this expense of blood was extinguished a flame that arose as suddenly, burned as fiercely, and decayed as rapidly, as any portent of the kind within the annals of superstition. The commissioners returned to court with the high approbation of all concerned-prayers were ordered through the churches weekly, that Heaven would be pleased to restrain the powers of the Devil and deliver the poor creatures who hitherto had groaned under it, as well as the innocent children, who were carried off by hundreds at once.

If we could ever learn the true explanation of this story, we should probably find that the cry was led by some clever mischievous boy, who wished to apologize to his parents for lying an hour longer in the morning, by alleging he had been at Blockula on the preceding night; and that the desire to be as much distinguished as their comrade, had stimulated the bolder and more acute of his companions to the like falsehoods; while those of weaker minds assented, either from fear of punishment, or the force of dreaming over at night the horrors which were dinned into their ears all day. Those who were ingenuous, as it was termed, in their confessions, received praise and encouragement; and those who denied, or were silent, and, as it was considered, impenitent, were sure to bear the harder share of the punishment which was addressed to all. It is worth while also to observe, that the smarter children began to improve their evidence, and add touches to the general picture of Blockula. "Some of the children talked much of a white angel, which used to forbid them what the Devil bid them do, and told them that these doings should not last long.-And, they added, this better being would place himself sometimes at the door between the witches and the children, and when they came to Blockula he pulled the children back, but the witches went in."

This additional evidence speaks for itself, and shows the whole tale to be the fiction of the children's imagination, which some of them wished to improve upon. The reader may consult, "An Account of what happened in the Kingdom of Sweden in the years 1669 and 1670, and afterward translated out of High Dutch into English, by Dr. Antony Horneck," attached to Glanville's "Sadducismus Triumphatus." The translator refers to the evi dence of Baron Sparr, ambassador from the court of Sweden to the court of England, in 1672; and that of Baron Lyonberg, envoy extraordinary of the same power, both of whom attest the confession and execution of the witches. The King of Sweden himself answered the express inquiries of the Duke of Holstein with marked reserve. "His judges and commissioners," he said, "had caused divers men, women, and children to be burned and executed, on such pregnant evidence as was brought before them. But whether the actions confessed, and proved against them, were real, or only the effects of strong imagination, he was not as yet able to determine;" -a sufficient reason, perhaps, why punishment should have been at least deferred by the interposition of the royal authority.

We must now turn our eyes to Britain, in which our knowledge as to such events is necessarily more extensive, and where it is in a high degree more interesting to our present purpose.

LETTER VIII.

The Effects of the Witch Superstition are to be traced in the Laws of a Kingdom-Usually punished in England as a Crime connected with Po litics-Attempt at Murder for Witchcraft not in itself capital-Trials of Persons of Rank för Witchcraft, connected with State CrimesStatutes of Henry VIII.-How Witchcraft was regarded by the three leading Sects of Religion in the Sixteenth Century; first, by the Catholics; second, by the Calvinists; third, by the Church of England and Lutherans-Impostures unwarily countenanced by individual Catholic Priests, and also by some Puritanic Clergymen-Statute of 1562, and some Cases upon it-Case of Dugdale-Case of the Witches of Warbois, and Execution of the Family of Samuel-That of Jane Wenham, in which some Church of England Clergymen insisted on the Prosecution-Hutchison's Rebuke to them-James the First's Cpinion of Witchcraft-His celebrated Statute, 1 Jac. I.-Canon passed by the Convocation against Possession-Case of Mr. Fairfax's Children-Lancashire Witches in 1613-Another Discovery in 1634-Webster's Account of the Manner in which the Imposture was managed-Superiority of the Calvinists is followed by a severe Prosecution of Witches-Executions in Suffolk, &c. to a dreadful Extent-Hopkins, the pretended Witchfinder, the Cause of these Cruelties-His brutal Practices His Letter-Execution of Mr. Lowis-Hopkins punishedRestoration of Charles-Trial of Coxe-of Dunny and Callender before Lord Hales-Royal Society and Progress of Knowledge-Somersetshire Witches-Opinions of the Populace-A Woman swum for Witchcraft at Oakly-Murder at Tring-Act against Witchcraft abolished, and the Belief in the Crime becomes forgotten-Witch Trials in New-England-Dame Glover's Trial-Affliction of the Parvises, and frightful Increase of the Prosecutions-Suddenly put a stop to The Penitence of those concerned in them.

OUR account of Demonology in England must naturally, as in every other country, depend chiefly on the instances which history contains of the laws and prosecutions against witchcraft. Other superstitions arose and decayed, were dreaded or despised, without greater embarrassment, in the provinces in which they have a temporary currency, than that cowards and children go out more seldom at night, while the reports of ghosts and fairies are peculiarly current. But when the alarm of witchcraft arises, Superstition dips her hand in the blood of the persons accused, and records in the annals of jurisprudence

their trials, and the causes alleged in vindication of their execution. Respecting other fantastic allegations, the proof is necessarily transient and doubtful, depending upon the inaccurate testimony of vague report and of doting tradition. But in cases of witchcraft, we have before us the recorded evidence upon which judge and jury acted, and can form an opinion with some degree of certainty of the grounds, real or fanciful, on which they acquitted or condemned. It is, therefore, in tracing this part of Demonology, with its accompanying circumstances, that we have the best chance of obtaining an accurate view of our subject.

The existence of witchcraft was, no doubt, received and credited in England, as in the countries on the Continent, and originally punished accordingly. But after the fourteenth century, the practices which fell under such a description were thought unworthy of any peculiar animadversion, unless they were connected with something which would have been of itself a capital crime, by whatever means it had been either essayed or accomplished. Thus, the supposed › paction between a witch and the demon was perhaps deemed in itself to have terrors enough to prevent its becoming an ordinary crime, and was not, therefore, visited with any statutory penalty. But to attempt or exécute bodily harm to others, through means of evil spirits, or, in a word, by the black art, was actionable at common law, as much as if the party accused had done the same harm with an arrow or pistolshot. The destruction or abstraction of goods by the like instruments, supposing the charge proved, would, in like manner, be punishable. A fortiori, the consulting soothsayers, familiar spirits, or the like, and the obtaining and circulating pretended prophecies, to the unsettlement of the state, and the endangering of the king's title, is yet a higher degree of guilt. And it may be remarked, that the inquiry into the date of the king's life bears a close affinity with the R

desiring or compassing the death of the sovereign, which is the essence of high-treason. Upon such charges, repeated trials took place in the courts of the English, and condemnations were pronounced, with sufficient justice, no doubt, where the connexion between the resort to sorcerers, and the design to perpetrate a felony, could be clearly proved. We would not, indeed, be disposed to go the length of so high an authority as Selden, who pronounces (in his Table-talk), that if a man heartily believed that he could take the life of another by waving his hat three times, and crying Buzz! 'and should, under this fixed opinion, wave his hat and cry, Buzz! accordingly, he ought to be executed as a murderer. But a false prophecy of the king's death is not to be dealt with exactly on the usual principle; because, however idle in itself, the promulgation of such a predic tion has, in times such as we are speaking of, a strong tendency to work its completion.

Many persons, and some of great celebrity, suffered for the charge of trafficking with witches, to the prejudice of those in authority. We have already mentioned the instance of the Dutchess of Glou cester, in Henry the Sixth's reign, and that of the Queen Dowager's kinsmen, in the Protectorate of Richard, afterward the Third. In 1521, the Duke of Buckingham was beheaded, owing much to his having listened to the predictions of one Friar Hopkins. In the same reign, the Maid of Kent, who had been esteemed a prophetess, was put to death as a cheat. She suffered with seven persons who had managed her fits for the support of the Catholic religion, and confessed her fraud upon the scaffold. About seven years after this, Lord Hungerford was beheaded for consulting certain soothsayers concerning the length of Henry the Eighth's life. But these cases rather relate to the purpose for which the sorcery was employed, than to the fact of using it.

Two remarkable statutes were passed in the year