Woodville, in the realms of bliss, A broken heart is here at rest. But thou, Seymour, with a greeting, Such as sisters use at meeting, 6 That forty thousand lives could Henry, too, hath here his part; Only like a tournament; At the gentle Seymour's side, With his best-beloved bride, Cold and quiet, here are laid The ashes of that fiery heart. Not with his tyrannic spirit Shall our Charlotte's soul inherit; No, by Fisher's hoary head, Half the blood which there was By More, the learned and the good, As we can hardly flatter ourselves with the notion that we have many very juvenile readers, we must hold ourselves excused from quoting any specimens of the food for the young idea' presented in the Christmas Box. As at children's balls, however, it is not unusual to have a side-table, where mammas and aunts are treated with grilled pullets and mulled wines, while the juvenile guests rejoice themselves over the more conspicuous array of jellies and syllabubs, so Mr. Croker has found room in his tiny pages for a few pieces both of prose and verse, which we might very safely offer to the gravest of the reading public. For example, there is a song on the hero of Killykrankie, by Sir Walter Scott, which, we doubt not, will be almost as popular as any song he ever wrote: To the Lords of Convention, 'twas Clavers who spoke, Ere the king's crown go down, there are crowns to be broke; Let him follow the bonnet of bonnie Dundee. The bells are rung backwards, the drums they are beat; Come, fill up, &c. As he rode down the sanctified bends of the Bow, But some young plants of grace-they look'd couthie and slee, Come, fill up, &c. With With sour-featured saints the Grass-market was pang'd, There was spite in each face, there was fear in each ee, Come, fill up, &c. These cowls of Kilmarnock had spits and had spears, And lang-hafted gullies to kill cavaliers ; But they shrunk to close-heads, and the causeway left free, Come, fill up, &c. He spurr'd to the foot of the high castle rock, "Let Mons Meg and her marrows three vollies let flee, Come, fill up, &c. The Gordon has ask'd of him whither he goes- Come, fill up, &c. "There are hills beyond Pentland, and streams beyond Forth, Come, fill up, &c. "Away to the hills, to the woods, to the rocks, Ere I own a usurper, I'll couch with the fox; And tremble, false Whigs, though triumphant ye be, He waved his proud arm, and the trumpets were blown, That celebrated wit and humourist of our day, Mr. Theodore Hook, has supplied the same juvenile Souvenir with an effusion in verse, which, that our quotations may end gaily, we shall take the liberty of transcribing. Cautionary Verses to Youth of both Sexes. 'My readers may know that to all the editions of Entick's Dictionary, commonly used in schools, there is prefixed "A Table of Words that are alike, or nearly alike, in Sound, but different in Spell ing ing and Signification." It must be evident that this table is neither more nor less than an early provocation to punning; the whole mystery of which vain art consists in the use of words, the sound and sense of which are at variance. In order, if possible, to check any disposition to punning in youth, which may be fostered by this manual, I have thrown together the following adaptation of Entick's hints to young beginners, hoping thereby to afford a warning, and exhibit a deformity to be avoided, rather than an example to be followed; at the same time showing the caution children should observe in using words which have more than one meaning. 'My little dears, who learn to read, pray early learn to shun good friends accept our greeting, although from boar prepared: foul feeding be declared. and yet be pared again, For instance, ale may make you ail, your aunt an ant may kill, until we do explain. So poets can't the baize obtain, unless their tailors choose; In mirth and play no harm you'll know, when duty's task is done; We We suppose there are few who, having read some of these extracts, will refuse to join in the question, Why, when there are in the country men able and willing to contribute such things to literary pocket-books, there is no one production of this class which it is possible to point out as distinguished throughout for its literary excellence? Are the classics of our age to continue to see their beautiful fragments doled out year after year in the midst of such miserable and mawkish trash as fills at least nineteen pages out of every twenty in the best of the gaudy duodecimos now before us? It is admitted on every hand that there are few good painters among us, and very few good engravers; and it is admitted by all but the editors of the 'pretty pocket-books'* themselves, that there are not many good writers. Why should publishers of eminence go on year after year encouraging that busy mediocrity in letters, which even the humblest of their brethren would blush to patronize in the arts? Why should not some one bookseller make the endeavour at least to combine the efforts of a few of the masters, and present us with the result, undebased by any admixture of those vulgar materials, of which the utmost that can be said is, that fine prints, and a small sprinkling of true poetry are able to carry off a certain number of copies of the books they load and deform-in spite of them? They are running a race that their German brothers of the trade have run before them, and in which, we beg leave to inform them, more publishers have been ruined than in almost any other literary speculation of modern times. Success under the present system depends on the merest chances-coming out a week or two sooner than a rival-at best, the luck of procuring leave to engrave some particular picture, or a few scraps from the portfolios of men of letters, who take no sort of interest in the works in which these are to be all but buried. These pocket-books are, in fact, ornamented annual magazines. Why should not the history of the monthly magazines afford sound hints as to the proper -we mean, of course, the ultimately profitable method of getting them up? There is nothing so serviceable to the public as competition; but why should all the coaches take the very same road, when there are twenty that might conduct with equal certainty, and not very dissimilar speed, to the wished-for goal? Why should not different publishers choose different departments, both of art and literature? Why should we not have an ornamented annual magazine of antiquities; another of natural history; a third of poetry; a fourth of biography; a fifth, perhaps, * One of these gentlemen has given us, by way of embellishment,' fac-similes of the autographs of, we think, thirty living English poets. O fortunati nimium, sua si bona norint, Anglicola! |