Page images
PDF
EPUB

ADDENDUM.

UNLAWFUL SOCIETIES IN IRELAND BILL.] The following Report of Mr. Dawson's Speech in the House of Commons on the 14th of February, on Mr. Goulburn's Motion for leave to bring in a " Bill to amend certain Acts relating to Unlawful Societies in Ireland" will be found more correct than the one given at p. 357. Mr. Dawson said, that, after the long | party has followed party, faction has foldiscussion which the motion of his right lowed faction, and the whole history of hon. friend had undergone, he thought the country, which unfortunately presents it neither decorous nor necessary to detain one continued series of blood, massacre, the House very long with the expression and misery, is an ample illustration of the of his opinion; he was anxious, however, danger of ungovernable parties; besides to explain the reasons of his vote, and he the character of an Irishman, is of all should endeavour to do so as concisely others, the least suited for such a trial. as possible, by avoiding an unnecessary Rash and impetuous in his passions, he allusion to the general question of Catho- obeys only the impulse of the moment; lic emancipation. In the many eloquent his natural susceptibility lays him open to speeches which had preceded him, at the power of any demagogue who makes least one half of the time had been con- the strongest appeal to his imagination; sumed in discussing, not the conduct or his actions follow the impulse of this feeleffect of the Catholic Association, but the ing, and if reflection comes at all, it is merits of the Catholic question, and in the only from the bitter fruit of disappointsame proportion that reason and argument ment and defeat. It is to him, therefore, have been wanting to support the opposi- a source of the greatest satisfaction, that tion to his right hon. friend's motion, so it has been resolved to check this evil by appeals to the passions, and the powers of putting down all kinds of associations; imagination, have been applied to excite all kinds, because, though the Catholic the feelings and divert the judgment from Association was the most dangerous, the its proper subject. He should abstain, most mischievous, and the most unconstitherefore, from following such examples, tutional, which has ever been begot in and should confine himself to this observa- that country, yet the cure will be incomtion with respect to the Catholic question, plete unless the spirit of Association be that every passing event, and every pro- rooted out altogether. Let any man conceeding of the Catholics, confirmed him sider for a moment the character of still more strongly in the opinion which popular assemblies in Ireland, and, with he had always maintained. That a further but one exception, he will find the result concession to their claims is incompatible invariably the same, namely, ruin and dewith the safety of our constitution. struction to the actors, disgrace and infamy to the country. The only exception to this miserable catalogue, is the Convention of the volunteers in 1782. That assembly, without doubt, accomplished great and glorious deeds, and deserves the gratitude of every friend of his country, and of liberty; but the national restlessness was nearly breaking forth even in this assembly, and a civil war between the volunteers and the parliament was prevented only by the firmness and prudence of lord Charlemont, who determined to withdraw himself from the convention after it had obtained the first object for which it was constituted. The convention followed his prudent advice, and

With respect to the question before the House, it seems to him that no man who understands the Irish character, that no man who has read the history of Ireland with common attention, that no man who has watched the progress of events in that country for the last thirty years, can conscientiously stand up and support associasions of any kind whatsoever. From the earliest period associations have been the curse of Ireland. In no country has the division of the inhabitants been so marked, so decided, so indelible, as in Ireland. The division between the Irish and the English has descended, under various denominations, through seven centuries;

[ocr errors]

it dissolved itself just at the critical time when the volunteers on one side, and the government on the other, were prepared for a contest to decide the question of parliamentary reform. But with this exception, the history of every popular assembly in Ireland is tragical and disgraceful. What was the result of the Catholic Committee in 1793? What was the result of the Society of United Irishmen in 1796 and 7? A most bloody rebellion; a rebellion that laid waste the country from the north to the south, ruined thousands of families, and reduced the kingdom to the lowest state of misery and degrada tion. What was the result of the Catholic Board in 1812 and 1813; almost a continued interruption of the public tranquillity from that time to this. The most violent exasperation of one party against the other. The consequent effects of that exasperation, a servile war, robbery, murder, and assassination, accompanied with the necessary preventions, namely, Peace Preservation acts, Suspension of the Habeas Corpus, Constabulary acts and Insurrection acts. This, Sir, is the history of all popular assemblies in Ireland; but he should leave the catalogue unfinished, if, in the list of popular assemblies, he omitted to mention the name of the Irish parliament. Let any man look at the extraordinary acts of this body of the collective wisdom of the country, 24 or 25 folio volumes of statutes, in which human ingenuity seems stretched to the utmost point to find out what is not suited to the circumstances of the country, to multiply law upon law without care for their present execution, without foresight for their future effect. Look at the constant character of these legislators, corrupt and venal jobbers, the ready tools of every minister, ready to sell themselves and their country to the highest bidder; but, Sir, thank God, this parliament is annihilated, and better days have already begun to dawn upon Ireland from its connection with this country. It seemed, therefore, upon a general principle, that no man who is a friend to the peace or character of his country, can object to a law which puts down political associations of every kind whatsoever. The motives which bind these Associations together, can make no difference in the decision of the legislature, all must be put down to ensure the tranquillity of the country; and though he should always maintain that there is the greatest difference beVOL, XII.

tween the principles and conduct of the Orangemen and the Catholics, yet he would never become the advocate of compelling one party to submit, and allowing the other party to escape from the operation of a general law, which was necessary for the peace of the country. If he could be so blind to the principles of common justice, he could not be insensible to this plain truth, that one association begets another, and that the strongest argument against the existence of Orange Lodges arises from the encouragement which they afford to the continuance of the Catholic Association. He thought, therefore, that he acted consistently in voting for a law which puts down, not only the turbulent and seditious efforts of the Catholic Association to disturb the peace of the country, but which prevents the misguided loyalty of the Protestant from any exuberant display of its devotion; but he could not admire the consistency of the hon. gentlemen opposite, who vote for the immediate annihilation of every Orange lodge, without the proof of any charge except the oath of secresy, and yet oppose the extinction of the Catholic Association, whose acts no man yet has been bold enough to justify. The complacency and levity with which this inconsistent conduct is justified, is almost ridiculous. Who can forget the parade and pomp with which the hon. and learned gentleman, the member for Calne (Mr. Abercromby), introduced his motion to put down Orange lodges? Who can forget the violent speeches, and the opprobrious epithets which were used against every person connected with the Orange party? Who can forget the shouts of triumph which followed the discovery of the hon. member for Waterford (sir J. Newport) that the members of an Orange lodge subscribed three-pence each to buy pens and paper, in order to record the proceedings of the evening? But, Sir, these arguments were successful, and every well-wisher of his country consented to join in crushing the Orange lodges. But, what is their conduct now? In the speech from the throne, a distinct recommendation is given to heal the evils of Ireland by pulling down all kinds of associations. It is distinctly proved, that the Catholic Association has assumed a form inconsistent with the principles of the constitution; that it usurps the functions of government; that it exasperates party hatred; that it interferes with the 4 T

administration of justice; that it calum- of the country, it has associated in its niates the character of every respectable labours the priesthood, who have amply man in the country; that it paralyzes the repaid the expectations of the Association, magistracy; that it keeps the people, by their undisguised expressions of hosthrough the instrumentality of the priests, tility to the constitution of the empire, in a state of servile vassalage, ready to and by their unceasing efforts to instil the obey their orders however dangerous; and same hatred into the ignorant and infatuthat it levies a tax upon the people, to be ated peasantry. Now, Sir, many hon. converted to their own mischievous pur- gentlemen have said, that they see no poses, no matter what they are. All this is harm in the proceedings of the Association, proved; is as evident as the sun at noon and that the speeches of their leaders, day; and yet the hon. gentlemen refuse like all violent harangues, are soon to check the career of this dangerous forgotten. But, Sir, the Catholic Assoassociation. They still continue to hurl ciation takes care that the effect of their their anathemas against Orange lodges, speeches shall not be confined to those when, in fact, there are no Orange lodges who hear them; the auditors perhaps in existence; at least he would state for know their leaders too well to be much the satisfaction of the hon. member for affected by their orations; but when these Wicklow, who seems to think Derry the speeches are sent down to every little focus of all Orangeism, that there are no village in the country, when every insti Orange lodges in that city; they still con- tution in church and state, when the tinue to laud the peaceable, mild, and highest characters both in England and tranquillizing conduct of the leaders of Ireland are held up to public odium, the Catholic Association, and to condemn when the ecclesiastical bench, the judicial lord O'Neil for not abandoning his poli- bench, the magistracy, the parliament, the tical principles. They justify Mr. O'Con- laws of the land are calumniated and misnell and others for driving their country represented, when rebels who have suf almost into a state of rebellion by their fered from the offended laws of their inflammatory speeches; but they can find country receive public thanks, when the no excuse for lord O'Neil's continuing people are encouraged to unite in one stedfast to the principles of his family. general system to pull down every Can any man blame lord O'Neil for seek- establishment in the kingdom, these ing protection in the times of peril speeches are not to be judged by the through which we have passed? Can any character of the speakers, but by the man blame him for wishing to know who effects which they produce upon a creare his friends, and who are his foes? dulous and ignorant people. It will His father found himself deceived in the hardly be believed to what an extent appeal which he made to the humanity of this violence has been carried; and as he a neighbouring dependant. He found had no means of judging of the intentions kindness forgotten, and all the kindly feel- of the gentlemen who deliver their sen ings of nature destroyed by the poison of timents in the Catholic Association but by political hatred; and can we, or ought we, their speeches, as he had no means to blame the son who seeks only to know ascertaining the object of the Association those to whom he can trust? but by its proceedings, he should endesBut his objection to the Catholic Asso-vour to explain the impression which is ciation was founded upon much stronger made upon his mind by a few extracts reasons than upon an objection in prin- from them. ciple to associations. It appeared to him to be the most dangerous and most mischievous body which has ever been sufered to exist in Ireland. Its proceedings, the speeches of its members, the agency of the priests, all unite to make it the most dangerous engine to work upon the passions of such a susceptible people as the Irish. It commands a paid press to circulate its poison through every part of the country, it has orators who stick at no falsehood to alienate the people from their confidence in every established institution

What says the Finance report which was published in the early part of the last year, before the rent became as successful as it is at present, and 50,000 copies of which were circulated through the country:

"It exhorts the people to wait in the sullen silence of discontent for a more favourable opportunity and better organized resources, to prove to Britain and the world that we are men, and deserve to be free."-This language is plain enough, it breathes the spirit of disaffection, and of

[ocr errors]

disappointment at not having the power | self also to the assaults of the Catholic to carry these designs into execution. Association, by his observations on the But what says Mr. O'Connell a short Catholic claims. He is represented in a time afterwards, when the rent became report from the Association, which was to more abundant, and when the means were be circulated throughout the country, as daily accumulating of arming and organi- an enemy to the Irish people; and when zing the peasantry; he says, "He would one gentleman wished to have the exnot press the introduction of the claim of pression softened, Mr. O'Connell refused, arming the Roman Catholics, for if he declared that it was just, and that the did, it might be supposed that they were heir apparent ought not to forget that going to proclaim war at once." Now, there was once a duke of York who lost Sir, this sounds very ridiculous in this his crown and kingdom. Another orator House, but I should like to ask what is observed, "that by the public expression the effect produced upon the mind of a of their sentiments, the duke of York Catholic peasant in Kerry by this lan- might be induced to alter his opinion, as guage? Does it not prepare him, aye far as related to the Catholics of Ireland, and every Catholic peasant in Ireland, but that his was a life of no service." to expect that some great design is in agitation, and does it not prepare him to put into execution another favourite exclamation of the same gentleman, "Hereditary bondsmen, know ye not, who would be free, themselves must strike the blow." This may be called figurative language, the exuberance of eloquence, of a heated imagination, and so forth; but the Catholic peasant sees in it good practical matter, and would not be sorry to have it brought to the test of experience. He could read many other passages in the same strain, but it is enough that such sentiments are uttered, and circulated with assiduity among the people, to convince any one that the assembly from which they emanate is most dangerous and unconstitutional.

And what, Sir, is the language of the Association in reviewing the conduct of such members of either House of parliament, as venture to express any sentiment unfavourable to the Catholics; all courtesy, all moderation is abandoned, and the liberty of speaking our thoughts is represented as the highest crime against the majority of the Catholic people; one gentleman (Mr. Shiell), says, that "if the British legislature require the degradation of a whole people for the enjoyment of its advantages, that it is the asylum of intolerance," and so on. When lord Redesdale states in the House of Lords that he shall freely give his opinion upon the Catholic question, and shall not be deterred by the fact, that his assassination was preached from the altar by a priest in Dublin, the Association immediately decree that the assertion is calumnious, and not only calumnious, but an assassinating calumny. His royal highness the duke of York exposed him

This, Sir, is the tone in which they speak of the parliament; these are the sentiments which they circulate through every part of the country; he allowed, indeed, that such assertions are contemptible, but is it safe, is it just, to allow a slanderous faction to disseminate their poison among a deluded and credulous peasantry?

The same hostility pursues every mem. ber of the Established Church, wherever an effort has been made to counteract the objections of the Catholic Association. The archbishops, bishops, and clergy of all descriptions, are involved in a general anathema; they are held up to accusation, as plunderers by the Catholic Association, and they are denounced as usurpers by the Roman Catholic clergy. Every act of kindness, of charity, of duty, performed by the Protestant clergy towards the poor of their districts, has been forgotten since the establishment of the Catholic Associa tion. During the severe season of distress in the West of Ireland, in the year 1822, the archbishop of Tuam, who with true charity exerted himself for the relief of the poor, received the following address from Dr. Kelly, the Roman Catholic archbishop of the diocese:

"Resolved, That the judicious, efficient and unwearied exertions of his grace the archbishop of Tuam, in the causes of charity, call forth our warmest sentiments of admiration, and we now beg to offer him the humble tribute of our sincere gratitude, hoping that his benignity of character, and his active and well-directed beneficence (qualities worthy of our emulation), may long continue to shed their influence over us.

OLIVER KELLY." At this time, there was no Catholic

[ocr errors]

Association; but last year under the baneful influence of their body, which infects and poisons every thing that comes in contact with it, the Roman Catholic clergy of the same diocese published an atrocious and infamous resolution, accusing the archbishop of having introduced a party of military, with drawn swords, for the purpose of intimidating, and perhaps massacreing the Roman Catholic clergyman, insiduously invited to a meeting.

But, Sir, not satisfied with every indignity that can be offered personally to the highest dignitaries of the Church; the leader of the Association, at its very last meeting, gave to a people, already through the agency of their priests worked up to the highest state of fanatical hatred against the members of the Established Church, the humane hint of massacreing them by wholesale. At the last meeting, Mr. O'Connell said, "Scotland did not exhibit the patience and self-control of Ireland, nor patiently suffer herself to be trampled on, while her oppressors rode by in triumph. She hewed down with the sword of the Lord the archbishops and bishops, and when the force of the British arms became too strong for her people, they retired to their mountains, and after renovating their vigour they returned to carry desolation to the very dwelling of their assailants."

Now, Sir, does such language as this require any comment? To whom is it addressed? not to the Association, but to the Roman Catholic peasantry, the most ignorant, the most deluded peasantry in the world, and unfortunately the most ready tools for any work of blood.

The same observations apply to those who are intrusted with the administration of justice. The chancellor, the judges, the magistrates, all come in for their share of abuse. There is an exception, indeed, in favour of those who are known to entertain opinions favourable to the Catholic cause; but the honest and conscientious assertion of an adverse opinion, no matter how amiable in private and how pure in public life the individual may be, is sufficient to have him represented by the Catholic press, in every cabin in Ireland, as a tyrant and a despot. In speaking of the chancellor of Ireland, Mr. O'Connell says that "the chancellorship of lord Manners, and the Attorney-generalship of Mr. Saurin, tended to degrade the dignity and sully the independence of a bar,

which had given a tone to the public feeling of Ireland." Sir, the bar of Ireland rejects the hypocritical compliment; the dignified characters who have adorned it, the judges' Burton, Jebb, Bush and Pennefather, find more honour in being associated with such men as lord Manners and Mr. Saurin, than in all the hypocritical cant of the Catholic Association.

Again, Sir, what is their language respecting the magistracy? that the administration of justice in Ireland is corrupted at its very source; that a simple despotism weighs with an equality of pressure upon every class of the community; that the sense of masterdom mingles itself in the ordinary familiarities of life, and that the administration of justice is partial, vindictive, and unjust." Sir,if any oneof these assertions were true, the laws would afford an ample remedy to the party aggrieved. But redress is not the object of the Catholic Association; it is more to their purpose to instil these dangerous falsehoods into the minds of the peasantry, and to prepare them, by undermining their confidence in every establishment, for deeds of aggression whenever they shall be proposed.

But, Sir, besides the speeches of the leaders, we may infer, from the proceedings of the Association, what great respect is entertained for the laws of the country. On the 24th of November, a Mr. Devereux and Mr. Hamilton Rowan were both admitted as members of the Association, and the announcement of their names was received with thunders of applause. The reason of this enthusiastic admiration is curious enough. Mr. Devereux was announced to be the almost only surviving delegate to the Catholic committee in 1793, and he was admitted immediately by Mr. O'Connell, as a matter of course, in that capacity: in other words, he was admitted because he belonged to an assembly which was declared to be illegal, and which was put down by law. The case of Mr. Hamilton Rowan was more notorious: and here he begged to express his regret at being obliged to renew the recollection of events long passed, and which certainly would have been buried in oblivion, so far as he was concerned, except for the indiscretion of the individuals themselves: they, not he, must be responsible for raking up the records of ancient and troublesome times. But Mr. Hamilton Rowan has made himself too notorious to be passed over in silence: he was secretary

« PreviousContinue »