Page images
PDF
EPUB

TILLOTSON.

[ocr errors]

JOHN TILLOTSON, archbishop of Canterbury, was descended from the Tilsons of Tilson, in Cheshire, and born in 1630. His father being a rigid Puritan and Calvinist, was anxious to instil his own principles into the mind of his son, and, with this view, sent him in 1647, to Clare Hall, Cambridge, under the tuition of Mr. David Clarkson, an eminent presbyterian divine. He continued at college two years after having taken his degrees in

arts.

He now became tutor to Edmund Prideaux, esq. of Ford Abbey in Devonshire, Cromwell's attorney-general; in which family he also officiated as chaplain, though without ordination, agreeably to the principles of the times. Being

in London at the death of the protector, in 1658, he was present, from his situation, at a scene in Whitehall, where the conduct of some leading divines of his own persuasion gave him insuperable disgust; and `after the restoration, he took occasion to be episcopally ordained. Adhering still, however, to the presbyterians, he was deprived of his fellowship at Clare Hall. In 1661, he complied with the act of uniformity, and was appointed curate to Dr.Thomas Hacket, vicar of Cheshunt in Hertfordshire; and the year following, was elected minister of St. Mary, Aldermanbury; but this he refused, because the vacancy had been occasioned by the refusal of Calamy to comply with the act. Yet, the year following, he accepted the rectory of Ketton, or Kedington, in Suffolk, which was similarly circumstanced. He afterwards became preacher to the society of Lincoln's Inn; and some time after, Tuesday-lecturer of St. Lawrence, Jewry.

About 1663-4, he began to be suspected of an inclination towards the establishment. In 1666, he took his doctor's degree, and early the year following, engaged warmly in the project of effecting an accommodation with the non-conformists, then brought forward by sir

Orlando Bridgeman, lord keeper of the great seal; a scheme he never entirely abandoned. In 1669, the king appointed him one of his chaplains, and gave him a prebend in the cathedral church of Canterbury, in which church he was soon advanced to the deanery, and in 1675, was presented with a prebend in St. Paul's Church. After the revolution, he obtained from king William the deanery of St. Paul's. He was elevated in 1690 to the see of Canterbury; and died in 1694.

The Sermons of archbishop Tillotson are his principal compositions, and are comprized in three bulky folio volumes. The twentieth sermon, on the subject of Charity, contains some general moral observations relative to the theological differences of the times, and will serve to shew his views on the subject of the accommodation he so much desired. The sermon was preached at the first general meeting of the gentlemen and others in and near London, born within the county of York; and to them it is dedicated: the author wishing, "that it may be someway serviceable to the healing our unhappy differences, and the restoring of unity and charity among Christians, especially those of the Pro testant reformed religion."

Give me leave

to recommend to you, this

new commandment, that ye love one another; which is almost a new commandment still, and hardly the worse for wearing; so seldom is it put on, and so little hath it been practised among Christians for several ages.

Consider seriously with yourselves; ought not the great matters wherein we are agreed, our union in the doctrines of the Christian religion, and in all the necessary articles of that faith which was once delivered to the saints, in the same sacraments, and in all the substantial parts of God's worship, and in the great duties and virtues of the Christian life, to be of greater force to unite us, than difference in doubtful opinions, and in little rites and circumstances of worship, to divide and break us?

Are not the things, about which we differ, in their nature indifferent? that is, things about which there ought to be no difference among wise men ? are they not at a great distance from the life and essence of religion, and rather good or bad as they tend to the peace and unity of the church, or are made use of to schism and faction, than either necessary or evil in themselves? And shall little scruples weigh so far with us, as by breaking the peace of the church about them, to endanger our whole religion? Shall we take one another by the throat for a hundred pence, when our common adversary

stands ready to clap upon us an action of ten thousand talents? Can we in good earnest be contented that rather than the surplice should not be thrown out, popery should come in; and rather than receive the sacrament in the humble, but indifferent posture of kneeling, to swallow the camel of transubstantiation, and adore the elements of bread and wine for our God and Saviour? and rather than to submit to a set form of prayer, to have the service of God performed in an unknown tongue?

Are we not yet made sensible, at least in this our day, by so clear a demonstration as the providence of God hath lately given us; and had not he been infinitely merciful to us, might have proved the dearest and most dangerous experiment that ever was: I say, are we not yet convinced, what mighty advantages our enemies have made of our divisions, and what a plentiful harvest they have had among us, during our differences, and upon occasion of them; and how near their religion was to have entered in upon us at once, at those wide breaches which we had made for it? And will we still take counsel of our enemies, and choose to follow that course, to which, of all other, they who hate us and seek our ruin, would certainly advise and direct us? Will we freely offer them that advantage which they would be contented to purchase at any rate?

Let us, after all our sad experience, at last take

« PreviousContinue »