Page images
PDF
EPUB

clesiastic, and an historian, valuable for having lived during an interesting time, and in interesting places.

He was by birth an Englishman, and had been educated in the court of Edward the Confessor; went thence to the court of the Duke of Normandy, to whose favour he was admitted, and there preferred. Some time after this, when the successful expedition of that duke had put him in possession of the crown of England, the duke (then William the Conqueror) recalled him from Normandy; took him into favour here, and made him at length abbot of Croyland, where he died advanced in years.*

Ingulphus tells us, that king Edward's queen, Egitha, was admirable for her beauty, her literary accomplishments, and her virtue.

He relates, that being a boy he frequently saw queen Egitha, when he visited his father in king Edward's court; that many times when he met her, as he was coming from school, she used to dispute with him about his learning and his verses; that she had a peculiar pleasure to pass from grammar to logic, in which she had been instructed; and that, when she had entangled him there with some subtle conclusion, she used to bid one of her attendants give him two or three pieces of money, and carry him to the royal pantry, where he was treated with a repast.'

As to the manners of the times, he tells us, that the whole nation began to lay aside the English customs, and in many things to imitate the manners of the French; all the men of quality to speak the Gallic idiom in their houses, as a high strain of gentility; to draw their charters and public instruments after the manner of the French; and in these and many other things to be ashamed of their own customs."

Some years before the conquest, the duke of Normandy (whom Ingulphus calls most illustrious and glorious) made a visit to England, attended with a grand retinue. King Edward received him honourably, kept him a long while, carried him round to see his cities and castles, and at length sent him home with many rich presents."

Ingulphus says, that at this time duke William had no hopes of his succession, nor was any mention made of it; yet considering the settlement of the crown made upon him soon afterward, and the reception he then found, this should hardly seem probable.

King Edward, according to Ingulphus, had great merit in remitting the Dane-gelt, that heavy tax imposed upon the people by the Danish usurpers, his immediate predecessors."

As to literary matters, it has appeared that the queen, besides

See Ingulphus's History, in the preface to the Oxford edition of the year 1684. See also p. 75 of the work itself.

See the same Ingulphus, p. 62.

m Ibid. p. 62.

n Ibid. p. 65. 68.
• Ibid. p. 65.

the usual accomplishments of the times, (which she undoubtedly possessed,) had been instructed also in superior sorts of knowledge. She may be supposed, therefore, to have surpassed not only her own court, but perhaps other courts since, as they have seldom more to boast than the fashionable polish.

For the literary qualifications of our historian himself, we perceive something of his education in what we have already quoted from him. He is more particular afterwards, when he tells that he was first bred at Westminster, and then sent to Oxford; that in the first he learned grammar, in the last he studied Aristotle and the rhetoric of Cicero: that finding himself superior to many of his contemporaries, and disdaining the littleness of his own family, he left home, sought the palaces of kings and princes, &c. &c. It was thus that, after a variety of events, he became secretary to the duke of Normandy, afterwards William the Conqueror, and so pursued his fortune till he became abbot of Croyland."

We shal! only remark on this narrative, that Westminster and Oxford seem to have been destined to the same purposes then as now; that the scholar at Westminster was to begin, and at Oxford was to finish: a plan of education which still exists; which is not easy to be mended; and which can plead so ancient and so uninterrupted a prescription.

Nearly the same time, a monk, by name Gratian, collecting the numerous decrees of popes and synods, was the first who published a body of canon law. It was then, also, or a little earlier, that Amalfi, a city of Calabria, being taken by the Pisans, they discovered there, by chance, an original MS. of Justinian's Code, which had been in a manner unknown from the time of that emperor. This curious book was brought to Pisa; and, when Pisa was taken by the Florentines, was transferred to Florence, and there has continued even to this day.

And thus it was, that by singular fortune the civil and canon law, having been about the same time promulged, gradually found their way into most of the Western governments, changing more or less their municipal laws, and changing with those laws the very forms of their constitutions.

It was soon after happened that wild enthusiasm which carried so many thousands from the West into the East, to prosecute what was thought, or at least called, a holy war."

After the numerous histories, ancient and modern, of these crusades, it would be superfluous to say more than to observe that, by repeating them, men appear to have grown worse; to

P See Ingulphus's History, p. 73. 75. This happened in the year 1157. See Duck De Auctoritate Juris Civilis Romanor. p. 66. 88. edit. Lond. 1679.

Ibid. p. 66. Amalfi was taken by the

Pisans in the year 1127.

s It began in the year 1095. See Fuller's Holy War, book i. ch. 8. William of Malmesbury, lib. iv. c. 2. among the Scriptores post Bedam.

have become more savage, and greater barbarians. It was so late as during one of the last of them, that these crusaders sacked the Christian city of Constantinople; and that while these were committing unheard-of cruelties in that capital of Christendom, another party of them, nearer home, were employed in massacring the innocent Albigeois."

So great was the zeal of extirpation, that when one of these home crusades was going to storm the city of Bezieres, a city filled with catholics as well as heretics, a scruple arose, that, by such a measure, the good might perish as well as the bad. "Kill them all," said an able sophist, "kill them all, and God will know his own." 99 V

To discover these Albigeois, the home crusades were attended by a band of monks, whose business was to inquire after offenders called heretics. When the crusade was finished, the monks, like the dregs of an empty vessel, still remained, and deriving from the crusade their authority, from the canon law their judicial forms, became, by these two, (I mean the crusade and canon law,) that formidable court, the court of inquisition.

But in these latter events we rather anticipate, for they did not happen till the beginning of the thirteenth century, whereas the first crusade was towards the end of the eleventh.*

About the beginning of the eleventh century, and for a century or two after, flourished the tribe of troubadours, or Provençal poets, who chiefly lived in the courts of those princes that had sovereignties in or near Provence, where the Provençal language was spoken. It was in this language they wrote: a language which, though obsolete now, was then esteemed the best in Europe, being prior to the Italian of Dante and Petrarch.

They were called troubadours from trouver, "to find" or "to invent," like the Greek appellation, poet, which means (we know) "a maker."

Their subjects were mostly gallantry and love, in which their licentious ideas, we are told, were excessive. Princes did not

In the year 1204. See the same Fuller, b. iii. c. 17; and Nicetas the Choniate, already quoted at large, from p. 472 to 475.

The crusades against them began in the year 1206; the massacres were during the whole course of the war; see Fuller's Holy War, b. iii. from c. 18 to 22. especially c. 21; and Mosheim's Church History, under the article Albigenses.

Tuez les tous: Dieu connoit ceux, qui sont a lui. Histoire de Troubadours, vol. i. p. 193.

In the year 1095 or 1096. Fuller's Holy War, p, 21; and William of Malmesbury, before quoted.

It is to be remarked, that these two events, I mean the sacking of Constanti

nople, and the massacres of the Albigeois, happened more than a hundred years after this Holy War had been begun, and after its more splendid parts were past; that is to say, the taking of Jerusalem, the establishment of a kingdom there, (which lasted eighty years,) and the gallant efforts of Cœur de Leon against Saladin. All against the Saracens, that followed, was languid, and, for the greater part of it, ad

verse.

See a work, 3 vols. 12mo. entitled, Histoire Litteraire de Troubadours, printed at Paris 1774, where there is an ample detail both of them and their poems.

2 See Hist. de Troub, vol. i. Discours prelim. p. 25.

a

disdain to be of their number; such, among others, as our Richard Coeur de Leon, and the celebrated William count of Poictou, who was a contemporary with William the Conqueror and his sons.

A sonnet or two, made by Richard, are preserved; but they are obscure, and, as far as intelligible, of little value."

The sonnets of William of Poictou, now remaining, are (as we are informed) of the most licentious kind, for a more licentious man never existed.

Historians tell us, that near one of his castles he founded a sort of abbey for women of pleasure, and appointed the most celebrated among his ladies to the offices of abbess, prioress, &c.; that he dismissed his wife, and taking the wife of a certain viscount, lived with her publicly; that being excommunicated for this by Girard, bishop of Angouleme, and commanded to put away his unlawful companion, he replied, "Thou shalt sooner curl hair upon that bald pate of thine, than will I submit to a divorce from the viscountess;" that having received a like rebuke, attended with an excommunication from his own bishop, the bishop of Poictou, he seized him by the hair, and was about to despatch him, but suddenly stopped by saying, "I have that aversion to thee, thou shalt never enter heaven through the assistance of my hand.d

If I might be permitted to digress, I would observe that Hamlet has adopted precisely the same sentiment. When he declines the opportunity offered him of killing the king at his prayers, he has the following expressions, among many others:

A villain kills my father, and for that
I, his sole son, do this same villain send
To heav'n-O! this is hire and salary,

Not revenge.

Act iii. sc. 10.

It is hard to defend so strange a sentiment either in Hamlet or the count. We shall only remark, that Hamlet, when he delivered it, was perfectly cool; the count, agitated by impetuous

rage.

This count, as he grew older, became, as many others have done, from a profligate a devotee; engaged in one of the first crusades; led a large body of troops into the East; from which, however, after his troops had been routed, and most of them destroyed, he himself returned with ignominy home.

a Hist. de Troub. vol. i. p. 25.

b Ibid. p. 54.

c Ibid. p. 7.

As to his famous abbey or nunnery, soon after mentioned, see the same work, p. 3,4; but more particularly and authentically, see William of Malmesbury, a writer nearly contemporary, and from whom the narrative here given is taken. The passage in

Malmesbury begins with the words, Erat tum Willielmus, comes Pictavorum, &c. p. 96. edit. Londin. fol. 1596.

d The words in Malmesbury are, Nec cœlum unquam intrabis meæ manus ministerio, p. 96.

e See the same William of Malmesbury, p. 75. 84.

The loose gallantry of these troubadours may remind us of the poetry during the reign of our second Charles; nor were the manners of one court unlike those of the other, unless that those of the court of Poictou were more abandoned of the two.

Be that as it may, we may fairly, I think, conclude, if we compare the two periods, there were men as wicked during the early period, as during the latter; and not only so, but wicked in vices of exactly the same character.

If we seek for vices of another character, we read, at the same era, concerning a neighbouring kingdom to Poictou, that "all the people of rank were so blinded with avarice, that it might be truly said of them, (according to Juvenal,)

Not one regards the method, how he gains,
But, fix'd his resolution, gain he must.

"The more they discoursed about right, the greater their injuries. Those who were called the justiciaries, were the head of all injustice. The sheriffs and magistrates, whose duty was justice and judgment, were more atrocious than the very thieves and robbers, and were more cruel than others, even the most cruel. The king himself, when he had leased his domains as dear as was possible, transferred them immediately to another that offered him more, and then again to another, neglecting always his former agreement, and labouring still for bargains that were greater and more profitable."

Such were the good old times of good old England (for it is of England we have been reading) during the reign of our conqueror, William.

And yet if we measure greatness (as is too often the case with heroes) by any other measure than that of moral rectitude, we cannot but admit that he must have been great, who could conquer a country so much larger than his own, and transmit the permanent possession of it to his family. The numerous Norman families with which he filled this island, and the very few Saxon ones which he suffered to remain, sufficiently shew us the extent of this revolution.

As to his taste, (for it is taste we investigate, as often as we are able,) there is a curious fact related of him by John of Salisbury, a learned writer, who lived as early as the times of Stephen and Henry the Second.

This author informs us, that William, after he was once settled in the peaceable possession of his kingdom, sent ambassadors to foreign nations, that they should collect for him, out of all the celebrated mansions, whatever should appear to them magnificent or admirable.

See Henrici Huntindoniensis Histor. 1. vii. p. 212, inter Scriptores post Bedam, edit. London. 1594, beginning from the words, Principes omnes, &c. The verse

from Juvenal is,

Unde habeat, quærit nemo, sel (portet habere.

« PreviousContinue »