have ascertained, we will suppose, the laws of Electric Polarity; but we have then to ask, What is the relation of this Polarity to Chemical Composition? This was the great problem which, constantly present to the minds of electro-chemical inquirers, drew them on, with the promise of some deep and comprehensive insight into the mechanism of nature. Long tasks of research, though only subsidiary to this, were cheerfully undertaken. Thus Faraday' describes himself as compelled to set about satisfying himself of the identity of common, animal, and voltaic electricity, as "the decision of a doubtful point which interfered with the extension of his views, and destroyed the strictness of reasoning." Having established this identity, he proceeded with his grand undertaking of electro-chemical research. The connexion of electrical currents with chemical action, though kept out of sight in the account we have hitherto given, was never forgotten by the experimenters; for, in fact, the modes in which electrical currents were excited, were chemical actions; the action of acids and metals on each other in the voltaic trough, or in some other form. The dependence of the electrical effect on these chemical actions, and still more, the chemical actions produced by the agency of the poles of the circuit, had been carefully studied; and we must now relate with what success. But in what terms shall we present this narration? We have spoken of chemical actions, but what kind of actions are these? Decomposition; the resolution of compounds into their ingredients; the separation of acids from bases; the reduction of bodies to simple elements. These names open to us a new drama; they are words which belong to a different set of relations of things, a different train of scientific inductions, a different system of generalizations, from any with which we have hitherto been concerned. We must learn to understand these phrases, before we can advance in our history of human knowledge. And how are we to learn the meaning of this collection of words? In what other language shall it be explained? In what terms shall we define these new expressions? To this we are compelled to reply, that we cannot translate these terms into any ordinary language;— that we cannot define them in any terms already familiar to us. Here, as in all other branches of knowledge, the meaning of words is to be sought in the progress of thought; the history of science is our dic 1 Dec. 1832. Researches, 266. VOL. II.-17. tionary ; the steps of scientifle induction are our definitions. It is only by going back through the successful researches of men respecting the compositen and elements of bodies, that we can learn in what seuse such terms ist be understood, so as to convey real knowledge. In order that they may have a meaning for us, we must inquire what meaning they had in the minds of the authors of our discoveries. And thus we cazzet advance a step, till we have brought up our history of Chemistry to the level of our history of Electricity;―till we have stabel the progress of the analytical, as well as the mechatreal sciences We are compelled to pause and look backwards here; post as berperal in the history of astronomy, when we arrived at the bank of the great mechanical inductions of Newton, and found that we wat trace the history of Mechanics, before we could proceed to * acharca" Astronomy. The terms “force, attraction, inertia, momenturm,” sent as Jack into preceding centuries then, just as the terms composé en” and “element” send us back now. Nest to a small extent that we have thus to double back upon que past alvazor. Next to Astronomy, Chemistry is one of the most greent of sciences (—the fold of the earliest attempts of man to command and undertand nature. It has held men for centuries by a kind of Siseration; and crable and endless are the various labors, the cares and successes the speculations and conclusions, the strange pertences and dentastical dreams, of those who have pursued it. To exeba al Doset or give any account of them, would be impossible; and for ver design in would not be pertinent. To extract from the mask that which is to our purpose, is difficult; but the attempt must be made eest endeavor to analyse the history of Chemistry, so news 2 has tended towards the establishment of general principles. We da' tas côten a sight of generalizations of a new kind, and de preguere velves for others of a higher order. Soon had his crew Opened into the hill a spacious wound, Anon out of the earth a fabric huge MILTON. Paradise Lost, i. CHAPTER I. IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOTION OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, AND RECOGNITION OF IT AS THE SPAGIRIC ART. ПНЕ THE doctrine of " the four elements" is one of the oldest monuments of man's speculative nature; goes back, perhaps, to times anterior to Greek philosophy; and as the doctrine of Aristotle and Galen, reigned for fifteen hundred years over the Gentile, Christian, and Mohammedan world. In medicine, taught as the doctrine of the four "elementary qualities," of which the human body and all other substances are compounded, it had a very powerful and extensive influence upon medical practice. But this doctrine never led to any attempt actually to analyse bodies into their supposed elements: for composition was inferred from the resemblance of the qualities, not from the separate exhibition of the ingredients; the supposed analysis was, in short, a decomposition of the body into adjectives, not into substan ces. This doctrine, therefore, may be considered as a negative state, antecedent to the very beginning of chemistry; and some progress beyond this mere negation was made, as soon as men began to endeavor to compound and decompound substances by the use of fire or mixture, however erroneous might be the opinions and expectations which they combined with their attempts. Alchemy is a step in chemistry, so far as it implies the recognition of the work of the cupel and the retort, as the produce of analysis and synthesis. How perplexed and perverted were the forms in which this recognition was clothed, how mixed up with mythical follies and extravagancies, we have already seen; and the share which Alchemy had in the formation of any sounder knowledge, is not such as to justify any further notice of that pursuit. The result of the attempts to analyse bodies by heat, mixture, and the like processes, was the doctrine that the first principles of things are three, not four; namely, salt, sulphur, and mercury ; and that, of these three, all things are compounded. In reality, the doctrine, as thus stated, contained no truth which was of any value; for, though the chemist could extract from most bodies portions which he called salt, |