nefs the founds defcribed; and there are words which, by the celerity or flownefs of pronunciation, have some resemblance to the motion they fignify. The imitative power of words goes one ftep farther the loftinefs of fome words makes them proper fymbols of lofty ideas; a rough fubject is imitated by harfh-founding words; and words of many fyllables pronounced flow and smooth, are expreffive of grief and melancholy. Words have a feparate effect on the mind, abftracting from their fignification and from their imitative power: they are more or lefs agreeable to the ear, by the fulness, sweetnefs, faintnefs, or roughness of their tones.

These are but faint beauties, being known to thofe only who have more than ordinary acuteness of perceptions Language poffefeth a beauty fuperior greatly in degree of which we are eminently fenfible when a thought is communicated with perfpicuity and sprightliness. This beauty of language, arifing from its power of expreffing thought, is apt to be confounded with the beauty of the thought itself: the beauty of thought, transferred to the expreffion, makes it appear more beautiful. But thefe beauties, if we wish to

think

*Chap. 2. Part 1. Sect. 5. Demetrius Phalereus (of Elocution, fect. 75.) makes the fame obfervation. We are apt, fays that author, to confound the language with the subject; and if the latter be nervous, we judge the

fame

think accurately, muft be diftinguished from each other. They are in reality fo diftinct, that we sometimes are confcious of the highest pleafure language can afford, when the fubject expreffed is difagreeable: a thing that is loathfome, or a scene of horror to make one's hair ftand on end, may be described in a manner fo lively, as that the difagreeablenefs of the fubject fhall not even obfcure the agreeableness of the defcription. The caufes of the original beauty of language, confidered as fignificant, which is a branch of the prefent fubject, will be explained in their order. I fhall only at prefent obferve, that this beauty is the beauty of means fitted to an end, that of communicating thought: and hence it evidently appears, that of feveral expreffions all conveying the fame thought, the most beautiful, in the fenfe now mentioned, is that which in the moft perfect manner anfwers its end.

The feveral beauties of language above mentioned, being of different kinds, ought to be handled feparately. I fhall begin with thofe beauties of language that arife from found; after which will follow the beauties of language confidered as fignificant: this order appears natural;

for

fame of the former. But they are clearly diftinguishable; and it is not uncommon to find fubjects of great dignity dreffed in mean language. Theopompus is celebrated for the force of his diction; but erroneously his fubject indeed has great force, but his ftyle very little.

for the found of a word is attended to, before we confider its fignification. In a third fection come thofe fingular beauties of language that are derived from a refemblance between found and fignification. The beauties of verfe are handled in the laft fection: for though the foregoing beauties are found in verfe as well as in profe, yet verfe has many peculiar beauties, which, for the fake of connection, must be brought under one view; and verfification, at any rate, is a fubject of fo great importance as to deferve a place by itself.

SECT. I.-Beauty of Language with respect to Sound.

HIS fubject requires the following order:

TH

The founds of the different letters come first next, these founds as united in fyllables: third, fyllables united in words: fourth, words united in a period: and, in the laft place, periods united in a difcourfe.

With respect to the first article, every vowel is founded with a fingle expiration of air from the wind-pipe, through the cavity of the mouth. By varying this cavity, the different vowels are founded; for the air in paffing through cavities differing in fize, produceth various founds, fome high or

fharp,

fharp, fome low or flat: a fmall cavity occafions a high found, a large cavity a low found. The five vowels accordingly, pronounced with the fame extenfion of the wind-pipe, but with different openings of the mouth, form a regular feries of founds, defcending from high to low, in the following order, i, e, a, o, u*. Each of these founds is agreeable to the ear: and if it be required which of them is the most agreeable, it is perhaps fafeft to hold, that those vowels which are the fartheft removed from the extremes, will be the most relished. This is all I have to remark upon the first article for confonants being letters that of themselves have no found, ferve only in conjunction with vowels to form articulate sounds; and as every articulate found makes a fyllable, confonants come naturally under the fecond article; to which we proceed.

A confonant is pronounced with a lefs cavity than any vowel; and confequently every fyllable into which a confonant enters, muft have more than one found, though pronounced with one expiration of air, or with one breath as commonly expreffed for however readily two founds may unite, yet where they differ in tone, both of them

muft

In this fcale of founds, the letter i must be pronounced as in the word intereft, and as in other words begining with the fyllable in; the letter e as in perfuafion; the letter a as in bat; and the letter u as in number.

must be heard if neither of them be fuppreffed. For the fame reafon, every fyllable muft be compofed of as many founds as there are letters, fuppofing every letter to be diftinctly pronounced.

We next inquire, how far fyllables are agreeable to the ear. Few tongues are so polished, as entirely to have rejected founds that are pronounced with difficulty; and it is a noted obfervation, That fuch founds are to the ear harfh and difagreeable. But with respect to agreeable sounds, it appears, that a double found is always more agreeable than a fingle found: every one who has an ear must be fenfible, that the diphthong oi or ai is more agreeable than any of these vowels pronounced fingly the fame holds where a confonant enters into the double found; the fyllable le has a more agreeable found than the vowel e, or than any vowel. And in fupport of experience, a fatisfactory argument may be drawn from the wifdom of Providence: fpeech is beftowed on man, to qualify him for fociety; and his provifion of articulate founds is proportioned to the ufe he hath for them; but if founds that are agreeable fingly were not also agreeable in conjunction, the neceffity of a painful felection would render language intricate and difficult to be attained in any perfection; and this selection, at the fame time, would abridge the number of ufeful founds, fo as perhaps not to leave fufficient for answering the different ends of language.