Squitter-wits and Muse-haters: Sidney, Spenser, Milton, and Renaissance Antipoetic SentimentThis study offers an approach toward Renaissance literary production, demonstrating that antipoetic sentiment, previously dismissed as an unimportant aspect of Tudor-Stuart literary culture, constituted a significant shaping presence in Sidney, Spenser and Milton. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
Abuse according answer antipoetic sentiment Apology appear argues argument artistic assertion associated Astrophil attacks authority begins Book Calender calls Cambridge charges claim Colin common Comus created critics dangers defense delight Denny desire discourse Early Elizabethan England English English Studies epigrams example Faerie Queene false fiction follow further given gives Gosson hand History idle imagination interpretation John King L'Allegro later letter lines Literary Literature London Lycidas matter means Milton mind moral Muse-haters nature never noted Oxford pastoral play poem poet poetic poetry poetry's political position present Princeton Protestant question reader reason references Reformation rejection Renaissance represents rhetorical Richard Robert Schoole sense Shepheardes Sidney's Sir Philip Sidney Sonnet Spenser Stella Studies suggests things Thomas tion tradition trans turn Tyndale University Press verse virtue writes York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Squitter-wits and Muse-haters: Sidney, Spenser, Milton, and Renaissance Antipoetic Sentiment |
| Author | Peter C. Herman |
| Edition | illustrated |
| Publisher | Wayne State University Press, 1996 |
| ISBN | 0814325718, 9780814325711 |
| Length | 284 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |