Argument at Geneva: A Complete Collection of the Forensic Discussions on the Part of the United States and of Great Britain Before the Tribunal of Arbitration Under the Treaty of Washington |
Contents
| 1 | |
| 23 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 36 | |
| 48 | |
| 52 | |
| 56 | |
| 231 | |
| 239 | |
| 248 | |
| 255 | |
| 263 | |
| 269 | |
| 276 | |
| 282 | |
| 69 | |
| 75 | |
| 89 | |
| 104 | |
| 111 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | |
| 143 | |
| 159 | |
| 165 | |
| 167 | |
| 172 | |
| 178 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 192 | |
| 205 | |
| 226 | |
| 283 | |
| 309 | |
| 350 | |
| 371 | |
| 373 | |
| 385 | |
| 443 | |
| 486 | |
| 513 | |
| 520 | |
| 532 | |
| 541 | |
| 550 | |
| 568 | |
| 579 | |
| 610 | |
| 633 | |
| 646 | |
Other editions - View all
Argument at Geneva: A Complete Collection of the Forensic Discussions on the ... United States No preview available - 2015 |
Common terms and phrases
Adams affidavits agents Alabama Alabama claims American Angra Pequena appears Appendix Arbitrators armament armed arrived authorities Bahamas belligerent Bermuda blockade Brit Britain British Counter British Government British ports Captain Semmes captured cargo claims coal collector Colony commissioners of customs Confederate Consul crew Crown cruise cruisers detain dispatch due diligence Earl Russell Emperor of Brazil equipment ernment escape evidence Executive fact February fitted flag Florida Foreign Enlistment Act Governor harbor hostilities Ibid injuries inquiry insurgents intended island July June jurisdiction Laird Law-Officers letter Liverpool Lord Majesty Majesty's Government Melbourne ment Minister Nassau nations naval Navy neutrality obligations offense officers opinion Oreto Parliament parties persons port of Liverpool prevent proceedings proof provisions question Rebel received referred repairs reply sailed Secretary seizure Seward Shenandoah ship Simon's Bay statement steamer submitted Sumter supplies tion Treaty Tribunal Tuscaloosa United violation warlike
Popular passages
Page 182 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 147 - ... principles of international law which were in force at the time when the claims mentioned in Article I. arose; but that Her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that, in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth...
Page 186 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the. base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
Page 441 - And the High Contracting Parties agree to observe these rules as between themselves in future, and to bring them to the knowledge of other maritime Powers, and to invite them to accede to them.
Page 14 - Whereas differences have arisen between the Government of the United States and the Government of Her Britannic Majesty, and still exist, growing out of the acts committed by the several vessels which have given rise to the claims generically known as the "Alabama Claims...
Page 15 - Government, the high contracting parties agree that all the said claims, growing out of acts committed by the aforesaid vessels and generically known as the "Alabama claims...
Page 405 - ... and every such ship or vessel, with her tackle, apparel, and furniture, together with all materials, arms, ammunition and stores, which may have been procured for the building and equipment thereof, shall be forfeited, one half to the use of the informer, and the other half to the use of the United States.
Page 401 - ... any officer of the army, navy, or marines, being duly employed for the prevention of smuggling, and on full pay, or any officer of Customs or Excise, or any person acting in his aid or assistance, or duly employed for the prevention of smuggling, in the...
Page 267 - A neutral government is bound— First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a power with which it is at peace...
Page 6 - Government relies; and the Arbitrators may, if they desire further elucidation with regard to any point, require a written or printed statement or argument, or oral argument by counsel, upon it...
Bibliographic information
| Title | Argument at Geneva: A Complete Collection of the Forensic Discussions on the Part of the United States and of Great Britain Before the Tribunal of Arbitration Under the Treaty of Washington |
| Author | United States |
| Contributors | Great Britain, Geneva Arbitration Tribunal |
| Publisher | D. Appleton, 1889 |
| Original from | the University of Virginia |
| Digitized | Sep 5, 2007 |
| Length | 653 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |